Key Points
- Cold Case Trial Commences: The trial of a 72-year-old mother, Halima El Bakhti, and her 74-year-old former partner, Ahmed Touloub, opened at the Loir-et-Cher Assize Court in Blois, central France.
- Historic Allegations: The main defendant faces charges of torture and child abuse leading to the death of her four-year-old daughter, Inass Touloub, whose body was discovered in a highway ditch in August 1987.
- Father Charged: The victim’s father is accused of failing to report child abuse and failing to assist a person in danger.
- Crucial Forensic Breakthrough: The cold case—known in France for decades as the “little martyr of the A10″—remained unsolved for 31 years until a 2018 DNA database match identified the victim’s brother.
- Demonstrations at Courthouse: Child rights advocacy groups gathered outside the courthouse in Blois as proceedings began, demanding justice for the young victim.
Blois (France News7) November 02, 2026 – A 72-year-old mother went on trial in central France on Monday accused of the torture and murder of her four-year-old daughter nearly 40 years ago, after a breakthrough DNA match reopened one of the nation’s most notorious cold cases. The proceedings opened at the Loir-et-Cher Assize Court in the town of Blois, bringing to trial a case that has haunted French law enforcement since the child’s body was discovered beside a highway in August 1987.
- Key Points
- What Forensic Evidence Was Discovered When Inass Touloub Was Found in 1987?
- How Did DNA Technology Lead to the Identification and Arrests in 2018?
- What Are the Confirmed Legal Arguments versus the Statements of the Defense?
- Background of Child Protection Frameworks and Cold Case Inquiries in France
- Prediction: How This Trial Will Impact French Cold Case Prosecutions and Child Protection Policies
As reported by courtroom correspondents for Agence France-Presse (AFP), the primary defendant, identified in court documents as Halima El Bakhti, arrived at the court with her head lowered and her face concealed by a scarf. Activists from child rights organisations lined the entrance of the courthouse, holding photographs of the victim and shouting calls for justice as the defendant walked past. Her co-defendant and former partner, 74-year-old Ahmed Touloub, used a walking cane and wore sunglasses, a cap, and a protective mask as he entered the building.
According to legal reports published by AFP, the mother faces charges of acts of torture and violence resulting in the death of a minor under 15 years of age without intention to kill, while the father is charged with failing to report the mistreatment of a minor and failing to render assistance. The trial before the Loir-et-Cher Assize Court is scheduled to run through 18 November 2026.
The judicial proceedings mark the culmination of a nearly four-decade pursuit of accountability for the death of Inass Touloub, whose unidentified remains were discovered wrapped in a blanket in a ditch along the A10 motorway near Suèvres in 1987.
What Forensic Evidence Was Discovered When Inass Touloub Was Found in 1987?
The initial discovery of the young girl’s body along the A10 highway triggered one of the largest missing child investigations in post-war French history.
As detailed in forensic reports obtained by Agence France-Presse, the four-year-old’s remains exhibited severe and extensive physical trauma. Autopsy findings documented multiple injuries across the body, including human bite marks—identified by forensic pathologists at the time as likely belonging to an adult female—along with severe burns consistent with an iron.
At the time of the discovery, no child matching the victim’s description had been reported missing in the region or across France. French judicial authorities launched international appeals spanning 30 countries, distributing tens of thousands of posters displaying a composite illustration of the child to municipal town halls, police stations, and public schools. Despite the extensive public appeal and international law enforcement coordination, investigators were unable to establish the girl’s identity or locate her legal guardians, and the case file was eventually shelved as an unsolved cold case.
How Did DNA Technology Lead to the Identification and Arrests in 2018?
The investigation lay dormant for more than three decades until advances in genetic profiling and national database integration yielded a breakthrough.
As reported by regional news outlets including La Dépêche du Midi and Franceinfo, forensic technicians re-analysed clothing items recovered from the 1987 crime scene—specifically genetic material preserved on the child’s garments and the blanket in which her body was wrapped. In late 2017, an automated cross-reference check in France’s National Automated DNA Database (FNAEG) produced a partial match with a young man arrested in connection with an unrelated violence offence.
Subsequent laboratory verification confirmed that the individual shared direct familial DNA with the deceased child, identifying him as her biological brother. Further genetic genealogy tracing enabled police investigators to establish that the victim was Inass Touloub, born in July 1983 to a couple of North African origin who had seven children in total. In June 2018, French gendarmerie officers arrested the parents at their respective residences.
During police interrogations following their 2018 arrest, neither parent confessed to inflicting the fatal physical abuse. According to investigative statements cited by AFP, the defendants provided conflicting testimony, each denying responsibility for the child’s death while leveling reciprocal allegations of severe domestic violence against one another.
What Are the Confirmed Legal Arguments versus the Statements of the Defense?
Confirmed Prosecution Allegations
- Systemic Physical Abuse: Prosecutors allege that the main defendant subjected her four-year-old daughter to repeated acts of physical violence and torture inside the family home, leading to the child’s death.
- Concealment of Death: The prosecution asserts that the parents deliberately refrained from reporting the child missing to statutory social services or law enforcement agencies to conceal the fatal injuries.
- Complicity Through Inaction: The charges against the father state that he was fully aware of the ongoing abuse and failed to intervene, seek medical assistance, or alert protective authorities.
Defence Positions and Statements
- Denial of Direct Guilt: Counsel for the mother maintains that she did not inflict the fatal injuries, citing historical domestic dysfunction and placing primary responsibility on her former spouse.
- Father’s Claim of Coercion: Legal representatives for the co-defendant contend that he was subjected to domestic pressure and did not participate directly in the physical assaults that resulted in the child’s death.
Background of Child Protection Frameworks and Cold Case Inquiries in France
The 1987 discovery of the child along the A10 motorway—widely referred to in domestic media as “la petite martyre de l’A10″—became a symbol of the challenges facing child protection agencies and forensic science during the late 20th century. At the time of the victim’s death, national cross-referencing between social welfare databases, school enrollment registries, and law enforcement missing-persons files was limited by the lack of centralized digital networks.
In recent years, the French Ministry of Justice has instituted dedicated cold case protocols, establishing a specialized national division in Nanterre in 2022 to re-examine unsolved homicides using modern DNA technology, retrospective digital mapping, and advanced forensic sampling. The prosecution of historical child abuse cases has also intensified alongside growing public scrutiny of domestic violence statistics in France. According to official figures released by the French Ministry of Social Affairs, approximately one child dies every week in France as a result of parental abuse or domestic violence.
Prediction: How This Trial Will Impact French Cold Case Prosecutions and Child Protection Policies
The trial before the Loir-et-Cher Assize Court is expected to influence how French judicial authorities and law enforcement handle historical cold cases and statutory child protection mandates.
Impact on Judicial Precedent and Cold Case Testing
The outcome of the Blois trial will serve as a legal benchmark for the prosecution of historical homicides relying on cold case familial DNA matching. A successful prosecution after a 39-year lapse is likely to encourage French justice officials to allocate additional resources toward re-testing legacy physical evidence stored in police archives. Law enforcement agencies are expected to expand the use of familial genetic searches across unresolved missing-person and unidentified-remains files dating back to the late 20th century.
Reforms in Inter-Agency Child Safeguarding Protocols
The exposure of the systemic failure that allowed a four-year-old child to vanish in 1987 without triggering mandatory school attendance alerts or social service welfare checks will fuel ongoing legislative debate surrounding child protection oversight. Child welfare organizations and advocacy groups in France are expected to use the high-profile trial to press the government for stricter inter-agency tracking systems, mandatory real-time reporting protocols for prolonged primary school absences, and increased funding for emergency child protection services across all departmental jurisdictions.